@sinanjuchar1274
01/02/2023
|
@muuusirmoresays5210
01/02/2023
How long will the space cable car be
|
@muuusirmoresays5210
01/02/2023
Is possible space cable cars
|
not enough metal..but...possible, meteor can be a metal
|
@adamdymke8004
01/02/2023
Quick question. If the cable needs to be that strong to support it's own weight, then it is also under incredible tension. If the ribbon of a cable fibre is damaged by a micrometeorite, what prevents it from explosively failing an damaging the surrounding cable. Do they plan of braiding it or something to prevent a cascading structural failure?
|
the cable would form a curved path, not straight.
|
I already have a model
In use ground to 400 km
If you dual spin left 360 right 360 it roll up per 4 feet 16 tons of force holding it
Place cargo on ground 8 hours to 400km
|
@trustjesus8021
01/02/2023
PRAISE JESUS ALWAYS 👍😁🌎🌏🌍🇺🇸✨🎇🎄🎈🌺
|
@SeanCSHConsulting
01/02/2023
Yeah, they're really, really not.
|
This is just not realistic. The physics of the thing will not work.
|
@leonardoraz6375
01/02/2023
|
@Theeverything_0101
01/02/2023
|
@gregoryclifford6938
01/02/2023
OK, the concept is simple, compared to cold fusion maybe. Why not prove that concept on SpinLaunch scale? By that I mean, pretend it's the Earth, spin your merry-go-round, demonstrating it on a garage-sized project first? SpinLaunch has to match counter-weight balance with payload releases, and that's minor compared with varying stresses on cables that occur with adjustable payloads and counterweights moving to/from orbit? That at least takes gravity and weather out of the argument, leaving only basic materials and functioning right? When that's shown, please explain the answers to more onlooker questions?
-If graphene or carbon nanocables were available now, they'd first have been spread across the globe in a web of high-tension powerlines. True?
-More cable strength means more cable weight and more satellite mass/distance(force) to offset it.
-That's conductive material, so is this cable is lightning proof? Great power source, just not all at once? Electrical potential, friction losses and wear, static electricity buildup, arcing like a Tesla Coil?
-Ice, wind resonance harmonics?
-Mechanical advantage, it's pulling weight towards its anchor point as a payload weight goes up? Counterweight, what goes up must come down. Increasing/decreasing fulcrum distance, but how? Create or add orbiting mass by collecting space junk?
-Increasing speed for geosynchronous orbit, with what? Solar heatshield and wear sheathing sliding against moving or tethered lines? Slack in lines?
-Couldn't you do as much or better with steam and cold differentials, coming from the orbiting satellite in night/day heat cycling?
|
@MichaelJeffers75
01/02/2023
Why would you narrate the "what if it was severed" scenario than segue right back to "we should build a space elevator"? Maybe we should first clean up orbiting debris?
|
@anthonydefex3465
01/02/2023
|